Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

When claims of understanding are less than affiliative

  • Ann Weatherall
    ,
  • Leelo Keevallik
  • Linköping University
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Abstract

Conversation analysis has established that the smooth progression of interaction and the accomplishment of action rest on joint understanding, which is implicitly built by a next turn of talk. In this article we examine explicit claims to intersubjective understanding from a range of settings from the institutional to the mundane. Our target expressions have the general form; I + ‘understand’ + YOU + PSYCHOLOGICAL FORMULATION such as I understand your concern and I see that this is frustrating you. We propose these expressions do “pro forma” affiliation—that is, they make a show of affiliating, even if in fact there is no affiliation. By explicitly claiming and demonstrating an understanding of the other speaker’s subjectivity, our target expression orients to misalignment between the parties, makes a show of other-attentiveness and bridges a shift that advances a speaker’s interactional agenda. Our contribution is to show the strategic function of a previously undocumented pro-social grammatical-conversational structure. Data are in English, and in Estonian and Swedish with English translation.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 167-182

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Research on Language and Social Interaction (Volume 49, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/08/2016

Publication status

Published - 02/08/2016

ISSN

0835-1813

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/625727
  • Scopus: 84980378756

Access to documents

Publication metrics