Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The challenge of achieving transparency in undergraduate honours-level dissertation supervision

  • Mary Malcolm
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

The undergraduate honours-level dissertation is a significant component of many UK undergraduate programmes, as a key stage in the longer-term intellectual and career development of potential researchers and knowledge-workers, and also a critical contributor to immediate award outcome. This study aims to identify how dissertation supervisors balance and deliver on these expectations. Qualitative analysis of twenty interviews conducted with supervisors at two post-1992 UK universities identifies how supervisors construct supervision as a multi-stage process. Supervisors describe how their individual supervisory practices enable them to maintain initial control of the dissertation, to extend supervisee autonomy at a central stage, and to distance supervisors further from the written output at a final stage in the process. This study questions whether this approach is satisfactory either in an institutional context where the supervisor is also first marker of work they may have shaped substantially, or as a pedagogic approach to developing research skills.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 101-117

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Teaching in Higher Education (Volume 28, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 27/05/2020
  • Published - 11/06/2020

Publication status

Published - 11/06/2020

ISSN

1356-2517

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/624041
  • Scopus: 85087024246

Access to documents

Publication metrics

Metrics

Download statistics
Download count
2