Short, frequent high-intensity physical activity breaks reduce appetite compared to a continuous moderate-intensity exercise bout

Benjamin Maylor
,
Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer
,
Charlie J. Orton
,
Daniel Bailey

School of Sport Psychology and Social Science

Research Output:

Contribution to journal

Article

Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

A single exercise session can affect appetite-regulating hormones and suppress appetite. The effects of short, regular physical activity breaks across the day on appetite are unclear. This study investigated the effects of breaking up sitting with high-intensity physical activity versus a single bout of moderate-intensity exercise and prolonged sitting on appetite control. In this randomised crossover trial, 14 sedentary, inactive adults (seven women) completed three, 8-h experimental conditions: 1) prolonged sitting (SIT); 2) 30-min of moderate-intensity exercise followed by prolonged sitting (EX-SIT), and 3) sitting with 2 min 32 s of high-intensity physical activity every hour (SIT-ACT). Physical activity energy expenditure was matched between EX-SIT and SIT-ACT. Subjective appetite was measured every 30-min with acylated ghrelin and total peptide-YY (PYY) measured hourly in response to two standardised test meals. An ad libitum buffet meal was provided at the end of each condition. Based on linear mixed model analysis, total area under the curve for satisfaction was 16% higher (p=0.021) and overall appetite was 11% lower during SIT-ACT versus EX-SIT (p=0.018), with no differences between SIT-ACT and SIT. Time series analysis indicated that SIT-ACT reduced subjective appetite during the majority of the post-lunch period compared with SIT and EX-SIT, with some of these effects reversed earlier in the afternoon (p<0.05). Total PYY and acylated ghrelin did not differ between conditions. Relative energy intake was 760 kJ lower during SIT-ACT versus SIT (p=0.024). High-intensity physical activity breaks may be effective in acutely suppressing appetite; yet, appetite-regulating hormones may not explain such responses.