Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

RPE-derived work rates can be accurately produced without external feedback or reference to the RPE scale

  • Alexis R. Mauger
    ,
  • Tabo Huntley
    ,
  • Iain Fletcher
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Abstract

Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are used to prescribe exercise intensity. This study assessed whether the accurate production of exercise intensity is affected when the rater cannot see the RPE scale. After completing a graded exercise test, 15 active, male participants (M age = 34, SD = 6.7 yr.; M mass = 73.9, SD = 14.8 kg, M height = 1.74, SD = 0.08 m) completed 3 × 4 min. cycling trials at four randomised RPE-based intensities (RPEs 11, 13, 15, and 17). Participants were allocated to a Full feedback group or a No feedback group (RPEs not in view). On the third trial, No feedback conditions were imposed on the Full feedback group. No statistically significant differences between groups' mean work rates were observed. Changing from Full feedback to No feedback conditions led to a significant overestimation between the trials for power output at RPE 11. Intra-class correlations were significant at RPEs 11, 13, and 17 between all trials for both conditions. Provided adequate familiarisation, active participants can accurately produce RPE derived work rates, even when RPE is not in view.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 507-521

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Perceptual and Motor Skills (Volume 118, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/04/2014

Publication status

Published - 01/04/2014

ISSN

0031-5125

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/625612
  • Scopus: 84904902263

Access to documents

Publication metrics