Nurse prescriber-patient consultations: a case study in dermatology.
- Molly Courtenay,
- Nicola Carey,
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review
Open access
Abstract
Aim. This paper is a report of a study exploring the content and processes in consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with dermatological conditions.
Background. Communication skills, consultation time, information and follow-up are central to the treatment and management of patients with dermatological conditions. The contribution nurses make to the care of these patients has great potential.
Method. A multiple case study was conducted with 10 practice settings across England in which nurses prescribed medicines for patients with dermatological conditions. Data were collected between June 2006 and September 2007 using semi-structured interviews (n = 40), patient questionnaires (n = 165/200) and videotaped observations of nurse consultations (n = 40). Data analysis included thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square and non-parametric tests.
Findings. Nurses believed that their holistic approach to assessment, combined with their prescribing knowledge, improved prescribing decisions. Listening and explanation of treatments were aspects of nurse communication that were rated highly by patients. Listening and dealing sensitively with emotions were also aspects of the videotaped consultations that were rated highly by assessors. Nurses were less consistent in providing information about medicines.
Conclusion. Triangulated data from this study suggest that nurse prescribing enhances the care of patients with dermatological conditions through improved prescribing decisions. If patients are to be more involved in this decision-making, nurses must give them more information about their medicines. The benefits of prescribing were most evident in the practices of dermatology specialist nurses. Further evidence is required to identify whether prescribing by specialist nurses offers similar benefits in other therapeutic areas.
Background. Communication skills, consultation time, information and follow-up are central to the treatment and management of patients with dermatological conditions. The contribution nurses make to the care of these patients has great potential.
Method. A multiple case study was conducted with 10 practice settings across England in which nurses prescribed medicines for patients with dermatological conditions. Data were collected between June 2006 and September 2007 using semi-structured interviews (n = 40), patient questionnaires (n = 165/200) and videotaped observations of nurse consultations (n = 40). Data analysis included thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square and non-parametric tests.
Findings. Nurses believed that their holistic approach to assessment, combined with their prescribing knowledge, improved prescribing decisions. Listening and explanation of treatments were aspects of nurse communication that were rated highly by patients. Listening and dealing sensitively with emotions were also aspects of the videotaped consultations that were rated highly by assessors. Nurses were less consistent in providing information about medicines.
Conclusion. Triangulated data from this study suggest that nurse prescribing enhances the care of patients with dermatological conditions through improved prescribing decisions. If patients are to be more involved in this decision-making, nurses must give them more information about their medicines. The benefits of prescribing were most evident in the practices of dermatology specialist nurses. Further evidence is required to identify whether prescribing by specialist nurses offers similar benefits in other therapeutic areas.
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1207-1217Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Volume 65, Issue 6)Publication milestones
- Published - 22/04/2009
Publication status
Published - 22/04/2009
ISSN
0309-2402External Publication IDs
- ORCID: /0000-0002-9615-7592/work/42581986
- PubMed: 19374682
- Scopus: 65349151914
Access to documents
Accepted author manuscript, 704.03 KB
License:CC BY-NC-ND, opens in new tab
Publication metrics
Metrics
Download statistics
Download count
3
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
68
34
