Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in non-clinical settings: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  • Julieta Galante
    ,
  • Claire Friedrich
    ,
  • Tim Dalgleish
    ,
  • Ian R. White
    ,
  • Peter B. Jones
  • University of Cambridge
    ,
  • NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England
    ,
  • ,
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
    ,
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust
    ,
  • University College London
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Introduction With mental ill health listed as a top cause of global disease burden, there is an urgent need to prioritise mental health promotion programmes. Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are being widely implemented to reduce stress in non-clinical settings. In a recent aggregate-level meta-analysis we found that, compared with no intervention, these MBPs reduce average psychological distress. However, heterogeneity between studies impedes generalisation of effects across every setting. Study-level effect modifiers were insufficient to reduce heterogeneity; studying individual-level effect modifiers is warranted. This requires individual participant data (IPD) and larger samples than those found in existing individual trials. Methods and analysis We propose an IPD meta-analysis. Our primary aim is to see if, and how, baseline psychological distress, gender, age, education and dispositional mindfulness moderate the effect of MBPs on distress. We will search 13 databases for good-quality randomised controlled trials comparing in-person, expert-defined MBPs in non-clinical settings with passive controls. Two researchers will independently select, extract and appraise trials using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Anonymised IPD of eligible trials will be sought from authors, who will be invited to collaborate. The primary outcome will be psychological distress measured using psychometrically validated questionnaires at 1-6 months after programme completion. Pairwise random-effects two-stage IPD meta-analyses will be conducted. Moderator analyses will follow a € deft' approach. We will estimate subgroup-specific intervention effects. Secondary outcomes and sensitivity analyses are prespecified. Multiple imputation strategies will be applied to missing data. Ethics and dissemination The findings will refine our knowledge on the effectiveness of MBPs and help improve the targeting of MBPs in non-clinical settings. They will be shared in accessible formats with a range of stakeholders. Public and professional stakeholders are being involved in the planning, conduct and dissemination of this project. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020200117.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

058976

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

BMJ Open (Volume 12, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 25/03/2022
  • Published - 11/04/2022

Publication status

Published - 11/04/2022

External Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85128014115
  • PubMed: 35410936

Publication metrics

Metrics

Download statistics
Download count
1