Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Intangible trust requirements - how to fill the requirements trust "gap"?

Research Output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Conference contribution Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Previous research efforts have been expended in terms of the capture and subsequent instantiation of "soft" trust requirements that relate to HCI usability concerns or in relation to "hard" tangible security requirements that primarily relate to security a ssurance and security protocols. Little direct focus has been paid to managing intangible trust related requirements per se. This 'gap' is perhaps most evident in the public B2C (Business to Consumer) E- Systems we all use on a daily basis. Some speculative suggestions are made as to how to fill the 'gap'. Visual card sorting is suggested as a suitable evaluative tool; whilst deontic logic trust norms and UML extended notation are the suggested (methodologically invariant) means by which software development teams can perhaps more fully capture hence visualize intangible trust requirements.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Conference contribution Peer-review

Original language

English

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2010

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2010

Publisher

University of Leicester, United Kingdom

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/279168

Host publication title

nan

Access to documents

Publication metrics

Metrics

Download statistics
Download count
3