Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Imagining power

Research Output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Chapter Peer-review

Abstract

Any discussion of moral norms for Carolingian lay noblemen must include attitudes towards power, since eighth- and ninth-century Frankish society was marked by strong social inequalities. Moralising texts often used a binary opposition between potentes (the powerful) and pauperes (the ‘poor’), although in reality the situation was probably more complicated.

In contrast to late Anglo-Saxon England, Frankish texts stress elite power more than wealth: potentes are far more frequent than divites (the rich). Many Carolingian sources also saw the pauperes in terms of lack of power or dependence, rather than poverty. Some texts, however, do contrast the ‘poor man’ and the ‘rich man’; Hans-Werner Goetz saw the pairing of pauper–dives as typical of narrative sources; it is also found in the lay mirrors. Power and nobility were also closely connected, but not conceptually equivalent. Jonas, for example, complains about the neglect of duty by ‘some powerful men [potentes] and certain noble married women [matronae]’.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Chapter Peer-review

Original language

English

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/11/2011

Publication status

Published - 05/11/2011

Publisher

Cambridge University Press, United States, United Kingdom
9781139017473

Chapter Number

4

External Publication IDs

  • ORCID: /0000-0002-6966-7503/work/26778250

Host publication title

Morality and Masculinity in the Carolingian Empire

Host publication editors

  • Rachel Stone