Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework

  • Lisa Bostock
    ,
  • Louis Patrizo
    ,
  • Tessa Godfrey
    ,
  • Emily Munro
    ,
  • Donald Forrester
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

The importance of supervision for social work practice is one of the most widely accepted tenets of the profession. Yet, surprisingly little is known about what happens in supervision, making it difficult to unravel what it is about supervision that makes a difference to social work practice. This paper describes the development of a framework for assessing the quality of group supervision. It focuses on one sub-category of group supervision – systemic group supervision – and draws a wider evaluation of systemic social work practice in the UK. It is based on 29 observations of “live” of supervision to illustrate differences in quality of supervisory practice. The process of developing the coding framework was cyclical, and ultimately resulted in a three-point ordinal grouping for assessing systemic supervisory practice. Analysis of observational data assessed group systemic supervision as follows: 8 as non-systemic (28%); 12 (41%) as demonstrating some incorporation of systemic ideas into interactions, described as “green shoots” (or showing encouraging signs of development but not yet reached its full potential); and 9 (31%) supervision sessions demonstrating a full incorporation of systemic concepts and practice. What marked “systemic” sessions from “green shoots” supervision was the move from hypothesis generation about family relations and risk to children to purposeful, actionable conversations with families: the move from reflection to action. This paper supports a small but growing body of evidence about the fundamental characteristics of successful or effective supervision within children and families social work.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 515-524

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Children and Youth Services Review (Volume 100)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 13/03/2019
  • Published - 14/03/2019

Publication status

Published - 14/03/2019

ISSN

0190-7409

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/623232
  • Scopus: 85063406123

Access to documents

Publication metrics

Metrics

Download statistics
Download count
3