Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research

  • C. Michael Hall
    ,
  • Bas Amelung
    ,
  • Scott Cohen
    ,
  • Eke Eijgelaar
    ,
  • Stefan Gössling
    ,
  • James Higham
  • University of Canterbury
    ,
  • University of Johannesburg
    ,
  • Linnaeus University
    ,
  • University of Oulu
    ,
  • Wageningen University & Research
    ,
  • University of Surrey
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Abstract

This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 352-356

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Tourism Management (Volume 47)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 08/08/2014
  • Published - 30/09/2014

Publication status

Published - 30/09/2014

ISSN

0261-5177

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/624292
  • Scopus: 84920138863