Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Challenges and enablers of collaborative working in the voluntary, community, social, faith and enterprise sector: impact, effectiveness, and sustainability

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Introduction: Voluntary, Community, Social, and Faith Enterprise (VCSFE) organisations play a vital role in supporting local health and care needs, particularly among underserved communities. However, they can often operate in isolation, making it difficult for vulnerable populations to access coordinated support. Luton Public Health led a pilot called the Collaboration Fund that encouraged joint working among selected VCSFE organisations, delivering services that tackle health inequalities. The evaluation of the Collaboration Fund assessed the impact, effectiveness, and sustainability of this collaborative approach in addressing system approach to improving health outcomes.Methods: A parallel mixed-methods design was adopted to evaluate this collaborative approach among VCSFE organisations funded by the Collaboration Fund in Luton. Impact was assessed using quantitative data from five lead organisations. Effectiveness and sustainability were explored by conducting 13 qualitative interviews with project leads and managers. Descriptive statistics and geospatial mapping were used for quantitative analysis, and qualitative data were thematically analysed using Framework Analysis in NVivo v.20.Findings: The impact findings highlighted that 7,177 service users accessed services, mainly by women and those living in Luton’s most deprived wards. The effectiveness of working collaboratively improved service delivery through shared resources, co-designed services, and increased community trust and engagement. However, challenges included overlapping roles, limited communication, and a lack of diverse staff among a few of the organisations (One lead organisation and their three partner organisations). Sustainability was impeded by funding constraints, with stakeholders recommending stronger networks, shared outreach platforms, and improved visibility of the local VCSFE services to maintain and enhance collaboration.Conclusion: The Collaboration Fund enhanced inclusive, community-based services through strong partnerships, multilingual outreach, and creative engagement, improving access and reducing isolation among marginalised groups. Collaboration was most effective when organisations with strong community representation partnered with less diverse ones. Sustaining progress requires continued investment, resource sharing, and strategic support to deliver collaboration and address inequalities.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

1763039

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Page 1763039 (1 page)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Frontiers in Public Health (Volume 14)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 06/04/2026
  • Published - 11/05/2026

Publication status

Published - 11/05/2026

External Publication IDs

  • PubMed: 42200122
  • Scopus: 105040417432