Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? a systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions

  • Christopher Bridle
    ,
  • Lauren Mawn
    ,
  • Emily J. Oliver
    ,
  • Nasima Akhter
    ,
  • Clare L. Bambra
    ,
  • Carole Torgerson
  • Newcastle University
    ,
  • Durham University
    ,
  • Leeds Trinity University
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background: Youth comprise 40% of the world's unemployed, a status associated with adverse wellbeing and social, health, and economic costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis review synthesises the literature on the effectiveness of interventions targeting young people not in employment, education, or training (NEET). Methods: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with a concurrent or counterfactual control group and baseline equivalence are included. Cochrane collaboration tools are used to assess quality, and a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The primary outcome is employment; secondary outcomes were health, earnings, welfare receipt, and education. Results: Eighteen trials are included (9 experimental and 9 quasi-experimental), sample sizes range from 32 to 54,923. Interventions include social skills, vocational, or educational classroom-based training, counselling or one-to-one support, internships, placements, on-the-job or occupational training, financial incentives, case management, and individual support. Meta-analysis of three high-quality trials demonstrates a 4% (CI 0.0-0.7) difference between intervention and control groups on employment. Evidence for other outcomes lacks consistency; however, more intensive programmes increase employment and wages over the longer term. Conclusions: There is some evidence that intensive multi-component interventions effectively decrease unemployment amongst NEETs. The quality of current evidence is limited, leaving policy makers under-served when designing and implementing new programmes, and a vulnerable population neglected. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014007535

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Systematic Reviews (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 07/12/2016
  • Published - 25/01/2017

Publication status

Published - 25/01/2017

External Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/624628
  • Scopus: 85010424085