Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A new approach to managing patients with problematic metal hip implants: the use of an Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team meeting

  • Reshid Berber
    ,
  • Yannis Pappas
    ,
  • Michael Khoo
    ,
  • Jonathan Miles
    ,
  • Richard Carrington
    ,
  • John Skinner
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
 Peer-review

Abstract

Background: Over one million patients worldwide are estimated to have a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. To improve the management of these patients and reduce surgeon uncertainty regarding decision-making, we designed an Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team (iMDT) working approach. Methods: From August 2012 to April 2014, the iMDT discussed 215 patients with 266 metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Of these, 236 primary arthroplasties (132 hip resurfacing and 104 total hip) were analyzed. The remaining thirty cases involved problematic revised hips and were therefore excluded. The possible recommendations of the iMDT were monitoring, further investigation, or surgery. The concordance between the recommendation and the actual management was used to assess the usefulness of this approach in reducing uncertainty in surgeon-level decision-making. Results: The median Oxford Hip Score was 35 (range, 4 to 48), and median cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood were 3.54 ppb (range, 0.18 to 161.46 ppb) and 3.17 ppb (range, 0.20 to 100.67 ppb), respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed abductor muscle atrophy in ninety-two (39%) of the hips and a pseudotumor in eighty (34%). The iMDT recommended monitoring of 146 (61.9%) of the hips, further investigation of thirty (12.7%), and surgery in sixty (25.4%). The actual outcome was concordant with the recommendation in 211 (91.7%) of the hips. Conclusions: Our iMDT approach to the metal-on-metal hip burden combines the tacit knowledge of an expert panel, regulatory guidance, and up-to-date evidence to improve decision-making among surgeons. The high level of concordance between the recommendation and the actual outcome, combined with the feasibility of the methods used, suggest that this method effectively reduces uncertainty among surgeons and may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
 Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e20

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Volume 97, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 18/02/2015

Publication status

Published - 18/02/2015

ISSN

0021-9355

Publication IDs

  • handle.net: 10547/582819
  • Scopus: 84928945803

Access to documents

Publication metrics