Abstract
In a recent paper, Fernández (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernández uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernández tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernández are not in line with recent documentation in this area.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 286-290 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Consciousness and Cognition |
| Volume | 33 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Feb 2015 |
Keywords
- Adaptive memory
- Belief
- False memory
- Memory distortion
- Nonbelieved memories
- Recollection
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: a commentary on Fernández (2015)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver