Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using a Bayesian averaging model for estimating the reliability of decisions in multimodal biometrics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The issue of reliable authentication is of increasing importance in modern society. Corporations, businesses and individuals often wish to restrict access to logical or physical resources to those with relevant privileges. A popular method for authentication is the use of biometric data, but the uncertainty that arises due to the lack of uniqueness in biometrics has lead there to be a great deal of effort invested into multimodal biometrics. These multimodal biometric systems can give rise to large, distributed data sets that are used to decide the authenticity of a user. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology has been used to allow experts to evaluate the reliability of decisions made in data mining applications. The use of decision tree (DT) models within the BMA methodology gives experts additional information on how decisions are made. In this paper we discuss how DT models within the BMA methodology can be used for authentication in multimodal biometric systems.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationnan
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)769525679
ISBN (Print)769525679
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006
EventFirst International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06) - Vienna
Duration: 20 Apr 200622 Apr 2006

Conference

ConferenceFirst International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)
CityVienna
Period20/04/0622/04/06
OtherFirst International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06) (20/04/2006-22/04/2006, Vienna)

Keywords

  • Bayesian model averaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using a Bayesian averaging model for estimating the reliability of decisions in multimodal biometrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this