Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding failings in patient safety: lessons from the case of surgeon Ian Paterson

  • Frank Milligan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While rare, incidents of inappropriate and/or unnecessary surgery do occur, so effective surveillance of surgical practice is required to ensure patient safety. This article explores the case of Ian Paterson, a consultant surgeon who was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2017 for wounding with intent and unlawful wounding, primarily by undertaking inappropriate or unnecessary mastectomies. The article details the main points of the Paterson case, with reference to the subsequent government-commissioned inquiry and its recommendations. It also outlines various strategies for enhancing patient safety, including applying human factors theory, improving auditing, and rationalising NHS and private healthcare. The author concludes that nurses have a crucial role in the surveillance of surgical practice and that combined reporting of surgeons' practice across NHS and private healthcare organisations is required.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)21-26
    Number of pages6
    JournalNursing Standard
    Volume36
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Patient safety
    • patient safety
    • patients
    • breast cancer
    • theatre nurses
    • research
    • professional
    • clinical
    • duty of care
    • ethical practice
    • audit
    • ethical issues
    • surgical
    • cancer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding failings in patient safety: lessons from the case of surgeon Ian Paterson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this