Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding airline organizational attractiveness using interpretive structural modelling

  • Cyprus International University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how key components of organizational attractiveness are interrelating to impose the maximum positive impact on the air transportation job market. An expert panel was shaped to gauge judgments regarding the driving power of each criterion over the other. The results of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) revealed that organizational and job characteristics are the main criteria with the most driving power in the model fostering perceived fit. In addition, corporate branding and corporate social responsibility (CSR) demonstrated the highest dependence on the other criteria. The results were further validated through Impact Matrix Cross-reference Multiplication to a classification (MICMAC). The hierarchical pattern of study findings offers theoretical contributions to the study of organizational attractiveness. Practical implications of the results and study limitations are also provided.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-466
Number of pages23
JournalAdvances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR)
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • MICMAC
  • airline
  • decision making
  • interpretive structural model
  • organizational attractiveness
  • Interpretive structural model
  • Airline
  • Decision making
  • Organizational attractiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding airline organizational attractiveness using interpretive structural modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this