Abstract
This article returns to issues raised in the pages of Dance Research regarding dance in the context of UNESCO’s 2003 adoption of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Bakka and Karoblis’ article published in 2021 refuted the proposal made by Iacono and Brown in 2016 to replace the Convention’s term ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ (ICH) with the concept of ‘living cultural heritage’. However, Bakka and Karoblis’ response was written in the spirit of ‘a discursive unity’ and, sharing in this spirit, I aim to consider both articles with the aim of highlighting how the discourses surrounding safeguarding ICH and those that consider dance as a significant part of culture might inform one another.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 66-78 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Dance Research |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 May 2023 |
Keywords
- Dance
- culture
- UNESCO
- Embodiment
- Heritage
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The tangible and intangible: dance and the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver