Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of gender in students’ ratings of teaching quality in computer science and environmental engineering

  • Linda Price
  • , Ingrid Svensson
  • , Jonas Borell
  • , John T.E. Richardson
    • Lund University
    • Open University Milton Keynes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Students’ ratings of teaching quality on course units in computer science and environmental engineering at a large Swedish university were obtained using the Course Experience Questionnaire; 8,888 sets of ratings were obtained from men and 4,280 sets were obtained from women over ten academic years. There were differences in the ratings given by students taking the two programs; in particular, teachers tended to receive higher ratings in subjects that were less typical for their gender than in subjects that were more typical for their gender. There were differences in the ratings given to male and female teachers, differences in the ratings given by male and female students, and interactions between these two effects. There was no systematic trend for students to give different ratings to teachers of the same gender as themselves compared with teachers of the other gender. Nevertheless, without exception even the statistically significant effects were small in magnitude and unlikely to be of theoretical or practical importance. It is concluded that the causes of differences in the career progression of male and female teachers in engineering education need to be sought elsewhere.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)281-287
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Education
    Volume60
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2017

    Keywords

    • Computer science
    • gender

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The role of gender in students’ ratings of teaching quality in computer science and environmental engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this