Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The mechanisms by which a whole-school intervention might improve sexual health: qualitative realist research nested in a trial in English secondary schools

  • Ruth Ponsford
  • , Rebecca Meiksin
  • , Veena Muraleetharan
  • , Nerissa Tilouche
  • , G J Melendez-Torres
  • , Josephine McAllister
  • , Maria Lohan
  • , Alison Hadley
  • , Honor Young
  • , Rona Campbell
  • , Catherine Mercer
  • , Karin Coyle
  • , Jo Sturgess
  • , Charles Opondo
  • , Stephen Morris
  • , Elizabeth Allen
  • , Chris Bonell
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • University of Bath
  • Hitotsubashi University
  • Teenage Pregnancy Knowledge Exchange
  • Cardiff University
  • University of Bristol
  • University College London
  • ETR Associates
  • University of Cambridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Whole-school interventions go beyond classroom education, promoting health by modifying school environments. These can be effective in delaying sexual debut and increasing contraception use but mechanisms are poorly understood. Qualitative research within realist evaluation can explore mechanisms via building 'context-mechanism-outcome configurations', describing how interventions trigger mechanisms that interact with context to generate outcomes. We explored these for the Positive Choices whole-school sexual health intervention within the intervention arm of a randomised trial conducted 2021-2025. Using 'dimensional analysis', we analysed 52 interviews with teachers and 40 focus-groups involving 266 students from 22 English secondary schools. Our results suggest seven mechanisms through which whole-school interventions might 'work': improving knowledge using diverse pedagogies; improving confidence and ability to talk by normalising talk about sexual health; changing gender attitudes through challenging stereotypes and providing insights and empathy with others' perspectives; promoting access to sexual health and other services via helping students understand their needs and entitlements; building school engagement by providing new student roles on decision-making groups; increasing inclusion of sexual-minority students by normalising consideration of non-heterosexual identities and practices; and reducing sexual harassment and abuse by helping students understand consent and when to intervene in harassment. Contextual contingencies included: high initial student needs; teacher skills and commitment; and school commitment and capacity. Our research suggests novel mechanisms via which whole-school interventions might promote sexual health. Quantitative analyses will now be conducted to examine these mechanisms and contingencies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118461
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume388
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Mechanisms
  • Qualitative research
  • Realist evaluation
  • School
  • Sex education
  • Sexual health
  • Humans
  • England
  • Male
  • Sex Education/methods
  • Focus Groups/methods
  • Schools/organization & administration
  • Sexual Health/education
  • Female
  • Students/psychology
  • Qualitative Research
  • Sexual Behavior/psychology
  • School Health Services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health (social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The mechanisms by which a whole-school intervention might improve sexual health: qualitative realist research nested in a trial in English secondary schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this