Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?

  • Adam White
  • , John Batten
  • , Stefan Robinson
  • , Eric Anderson
  • , Andrew Burns
  • , Jo Batey
  • , Helen Ryan-Stewart
  • , Russell Discombe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the United Kingdom [1]. This is because (a) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (b) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (c) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (d) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby [2]. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm’ [3]. Yet, the notion of risk (un) acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here [4].
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)114-115
    JournalInjury Prevention
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2018

    Keywords

    • C600 Sports Science
    • Health
    • Health and Physical Education
    • L510 Health & Welfare

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this