Abstract
Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the United Kingdom [1]. This is because (a) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (b) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (c) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (d) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby [2]. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm’ [3]. Yet, the notion of risk (un) acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here [4].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 114-115 |
| Journal | Injury Prevention |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 14 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- C600 Sports Science
- Health
- Health and Physical Education
- L510 Health & Welfare
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver