Abstract
In response to policy concerns in England and Wales and internationally, a considerable knowledge base has
identified factors statistically associated with reduced recidivism for children leaving custodial institutions.
However, despite resulting guidance on how to support resettlement (‘reentry’), practice and outcomes
remain disappointing. We argue that this failure reflects weaknesses in the dominant ‘risk paradigm’, which
lacks a theory of change and undermines children’s agency. We conceptualise resettlement as a pro-social
identity shift. A new practice model reinterprets existing risk-based messages accordingly, and crucially adds
principles to guide a child’s desistance journey. However, successful implementation may require the model
to inform culture change more broadly across youth justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-89 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Youth Justice |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Jun 2020 |
Keywords
- aftercare
- children
- custody
- desistance
- identity
- imprisonment, juvenile justice
- reentry
- resettlement
- risk
- youth justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Supporting children’s resettlement (‘reentry’) after custody: beyond the risk paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver