Abstract
Drawing upon current research in Northamptonshire, this article argues that the assumption, implicit in recent UK youth justice legislation, that formal criminal justice interventions with early-stage young offenders will have positive deterrent and rehabilitative effects does not appear to be borne out in practice. It contends that the use of informal diversionary strategies with, low-level, early-stage, young offenders may, in fact, have a more positive impact in terms of re-conviction rates, averting the escalation of ‘deviant careers’, reducing criminal victimisation and cost savings. The article concludes with a discussion of the political and administrative barriers to the implementation of such strategies in English youth justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 30-36 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Safer Communities |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Youth justice diversion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Safety Research
- Community and Home Care
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sometimes, less is more'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver