Abstract
Although some Christian norms of sexual behaviour were new, others drew extensively on both classical and Jewish traditions. Jesus in the Gospels said relatively little about personal sexual behaviour. New Testament sexual ethics were developed further in the epistles of Paul and his followers, and a strict code of sexual discipline soon became a key way of showing Christian communities as a ‘holy people’. By the early fourth century a clear contrast between a militantly ascetic view of the church, stressing celibacy, and a society of settled Christian households had developed. In the West, the prevailing view valued virginity and continence over marriage, and fourth- and fifth-century patristic writing about sexuality was almost exclusively negative. St Augustine, even as he defended marriage as good, developed a vision of sexuality as an enduring psychological drive, not easily tamed by society. Yet as Julia Smith comments on the intellectual resources available to Carolingian writers on gender and sexual behaviour: ‘that heritage was vast, and neither coherent nor consistent’.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Morality and Masculinity in the Carolingian Empire |
| Editors | Rachel Stone |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Chapter | 9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781139017473 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Nov 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver