Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Research on self-determination in physical education: key findings and proposals for future research

  • Lynn Van den Berghe
  • , Maarten Vansteenkiste
  • , Greet Cardon
  • , David Kirk
  • , Leen Haerens
    • Ghent University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    263 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: During the last 30 years, several theories of motivation have generated insights into the motives underlying learners' behavior in physical education. Self-determination theory (SDT), a general theory on social development and motivation, has enjoyed increasing popularity in physical education research during the past decade. SDT states that for students to be optimally motivated for physical education, it is critical to support the satisfaction of their innate, psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness by being autonomy-supportive, by structuring the environment, and by creating a warm and solid relationship with the students.

    Purpose: Our goal was to provide a critical review of 74 SDT-grounded peer-reviewed studies in the field of physical education, to identify research gaps, and to provide suggestions for moving this line of research forward by discussing how insights from a pedagogical view can contribute to the development of SDT-based research.

    Findings: The included studies confirmed the motivational sequence as proposed by SDT. It was revealed that future research can be of extra value if (a) combinations of the three dimensions of need-supportive practices are addressed, (b) more intervention and experimental studies are conducted, (c) more insight is gained into antecedents of teachers' behaviors, (d) a broader set of learning outcomes is investigated, and (e) relevant physical education-related contextual factors are taken into account.

    Conclusions: Given the increasing number of SDT studies in the context of physical education, this review recommends a better integration of pedagogical and psychological knowledge in future SDT-grounded work in the context of physical education. A better integration is needed because it can lead to ecologically valid and practical recommendations on how to enhance students' motivation taking into account the pedagogical context of physical education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)97-121
    JournalPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2012

    Keywords

    • Self-determination theory
    • motivation
    • pedagogy
    • psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research on self-determination in physical education: key findings and proposals for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this