Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Re-fitting for a different purpose: a case study of item writer practices in adapting source texts for a test of academic reading

  • Anthony Green
  • , Roger Hawkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The important yet under-researched role of item writers in the selection and adaptation of texts for high-stakes reading tests is investigated through a case study involving a group of trained item writers working on the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). In the first phase of the study, participants were invited to reflect in writing, and then audio-recorded in a semantic-differential-based joint discussion, on the processes they employed to generate test material. The group were next observed at a simulated item writers’ editing meeting to refine their texts and items for an IELTS reading test module. The participants’ written descriptions and recorded discussions provided rich data on how source texts were perceived, selected and adapted for the Test. The study reports findings from textual analyses using indices of readability and lexical density from the original material sourced by the item writers and their adapted versions for the test. Results from qualitative and quantitive analyses are discussed in terms of the implications for the IELTS reading module of editing actions such as: reducing redundancy and technical language, changing styles, deciding on potentially sensitive issues and relationships between texts and test items. The important issue of text authenticity in tests such as IELTS is also broached.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109
JournalLanguage Testing
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • academic reading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-fitting for a different purpose: a case study of item writer practices in adapting source texts for a test of academic reading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this