Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Raising of the participation age in the UK: the dichotomy between full participation and institutional accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At a time of mass youth unemployment in the UK, the introduction of the Raising of the Participation Age (RPA) policy advocates the benefits of a prolonged period of education for all young people. As part of the policy, accountability was placed on schools for its implementation, with government imposed destination measures being used as an indicator of the policy's success. This paper argues that RPA will have little impact on young people who are Not in Education, Employment and/or Training (NEET) and that the accountability for the policy's implementation is at best problematic and at worse fundamentally flawed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-377
JournalInternational Journal of Management in Education
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Further Education
  • Local authorities
  • Management in education
  • NEET
  • Raising of the participation age
  • Schools

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Raising of the participation age in the UK: the dichotomy between full participation and institutional accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this