Abstract
At a time of mass youth unemployment in the UK, the introduction of the Raising of the Participation Age (RPA) policy advocates the benefits of a prolonged period of education for all young people. As part of the policy, accountability was placed on schools for its implementation, with government imposed destination measures being used as an indicator of the policy's success. This paper argues that RPA will have little impact on young people who are Not in Education, Employment and/or Training (NEET) and that the accountability for the policy's implementation is at best problematic and at worse fundamentally flawed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 359-377 |
| Journal | International Journal of Management in Education |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Jun 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Further Education
- Local authorities
- Management in education
- NEET
- Raising of the participation age
- Schools
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Raising of the participation age in the UK: the dichotomy between full participation and institutional accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver