Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prospective isolation and characterization of chondroprogenitors from human chondrocytes based on CD166/CD34/CD146 surface markers

  • J.V. James
  • , Elizabeth Vinod
  • , Kawin Padmaja
  • , Abel Livingston
  • , Soosai Manickam Amirtham
  • , Solomon Sathishkumar
  • , Boopalan Ramasamy
  • , Grace Rebekah
  • , Alfred Job Daniel
  • , Upasana Kachroo
  • Christian Medical College
  • Royal Darwin Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
Chondrocytes, isolated from articular cartilage, are routinely utilized in cell-based therapeutics for the treatment of cartilage pathologies. However, restoration of the biological tissue faces hindrance due to the formation of primarily fibrocartilaginous repair tissue. Chondroprogenitors have been reported to display superiority in terms of their chondrogenic potential and lesser proclivity for hypertrophy. In line with our recent results, comparing chondroprogenitors and chondrocytes, we undertook isolation of progenitors from the general pool of chondrocytes, based on surface marker expression, namely, CD166, CD34, and CD146, to eliminate off-target differentiation and generate cells of stronger chondrogenic potential. This study aimed to compare chondrocytes, chondroprogenitors, CD34−CD166+CD146+ sorted chondrocytes, and CD34−CD166+CD146− sorted chondrocytes.
Methods
Chondrocytes obtained from 3 human osteoarthritic knee joints were subjected to sorting, to isolate CD166+ and CD34− subsets, and then were further sorted to obtain CD146+ and CD146− cells. Chondrocytes and fibronectin adhesion-derived chondroprogenitors served as controls. Assessment parameters included reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, trilineage differentiation, and total GAG/DNA content.
Results
Based on gene expression analysis, CD34−CD166+CD146+ sorted chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors displayed comparability and significantly higher chondrogenesis with a lower tendency for hypertrophy when compared to chondrocytes and CD34−CD166+CD146− sorted chondrocytes. The findings were also reiterated in multilineage potential differentiation with the 146+ subset and chondroprogenitors displaying lower calcification and chondroprogenitors displaying higher total GAG/DNA content compared to chondrocytes and 146− cells.
Conclusion
This unique progenitor-like population based on CD34−CD166+CD146+ sorting from chondrocytes exhibits efficient potential for cartilage repair and merits further evaluation for its therapeutic application.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)808S-817S
JournalCartilage
Volume13
Issue number2_suppl
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • CD146
  • CD166
  • chondrocytes
  • chondrogenesis
  • chondroprogenitors
  • Antigens, CD34/immunology
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal/immunology
  • Humans
  • Chondrocytes/metabolism
  • Fetal Proteins/immunology
  • Antigens, CD/immunology
  • Chondrogenesis/genetics
  • Cartilage, Articular
  • CD146 Antigen/metabolism
  • Cell Differentiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective isolation and characterization of chondroprogenitors from human chondrocytes based on CD166/CD34/CD146 surface markers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this