Abstract
This article presents findings from a study of the attitudes and beliefs of social security claimants engaged in benefit fraud. The basis for a taxonomy of such claimants is outlined, drawing upon concepts of reflexivity and anxiety. This is compared and contrasted with other theoretically-drawn taxonomies, one relating to workplace crime, the other to the consumption of social care services. Finally, the article considers whether benefit fraud is intelligible as resistance to social control. It is argued that benefit fraud represents a conservative form of resistance. Benefit fraud does not signify a “culture” of resistance, so much as a “manageable” form of rule-breaking.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-118 |
| Journal | Social Policy and Administration. An international Journal of Policy and Research |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 1997 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- social security
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Manageable discord: fraud and resistance in the social security system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver