Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Linking tests of English for Academic Purposes to the CEFR: The Score User’s Perspective

  • Anthony Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is widely used in setting language proficiency requirements, including for international students seeking access to university courses taught in English. When different language examinations have been related to the CEFR, the process is claimed to help score users, such as university admissions staff, to compare and evaluate these examinations as tools for selecting qualified applicants. This study analyses the linking claims made for four internationally recognised tests of English widely used in university admissions. It uses the Council of Europe’s (2009) suggested stages of specification, standard setting, and empirical validation to frame an evaluation of the extent to which, in this context, the CEFR has fulfilled its potential to “facilitate comparisons between different systems of qualifications.” Findings show that testing agencies make little use of CEFR categories to explain test content; represent the relationships between their tests and the framework in different terms; and arrive at conflicting conclusions about the correspondences between test scores and CEFR levels. This raises questions about the capacity of the CEFR to communicate competing views of a test construct within a coherent overarching structure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-74
Number of pages16
JournalLanguage Assessment Quarterly
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Education
  • language assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linking tests of English for Academic Purposes to the CEFR: The Score User’s Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this