Abstract
A critical reading of research literature relating to teaching and learning with technology in higher education reveals a number of shortcomings in how investigations are conceptualised, conducted and reported. Projects often lack clarity about the nature of the enhancement that technology is intended to bring about. Frequently there is no explicit discussion of assumptions and beliefs that underpin research studies and the approaches used to investigate the educational impact of technologies. This presentation summarises a number of the weaknesses identified in published studies and considers the implications. Some ways in which these limitations could be avoided through a more rigorous approach to undertaking research and evaluation studies are then outlined and discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | EDULEARN14 Proceedings |
| Publisher | IATED Academy |
| Pages | 5397-5404 |
| ISBN (Print) | 2340-1117 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
| Event | EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies - Barcelona Duration: 7 Jul 2014 → 9 Jul 2014 |
Conference
| Conference | EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies |
|---|---|
| City | Barcelona |
| Period | 7/07/14 → 9/07/14 |
| Other | EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (07/07/2014-09/07/2014, Barcelona) |
Keywords
- learning technology
- learning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving quality and validity in research and evaluation studies of learning technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver