Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Imagining power

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Any discussion of moral norms for Carolingian lay noblemen must include attitudes towards power, since eighth- and ninth-century Frankish society was marked by strong social inequalities. Moralising texts often used a binary opposition between potentes (the powerful) and pauperes (the ‘poor’), although in reality the situation was probably more complicated.

In contrast to late Anglo-Saxon England, Frankish texts stress elite power more than wealth: potentes are far more frequent than divites (the rich). Many Carolingian sources also saw the pauperes in terms of lack of power or dependence, rather than poverty. Some texts, however, do contrast the ‘poor man’ and the ‘rich man’; Hans-Werner Goetz saw the pairing of pauper–dives as typical of narrative sources; it is also found in the lay mirrors. Power and nobility were also closely connected, but not conceptually equivalent. Jonas, for example, complains about the neglect of duty by ‘some powerful men [potentes] and certain noble married women [matronae]’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMorality and Masculinity in the Carolingian Empire
EditorsRachel Stone
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter4
ISBN (Print) 9781139017473
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imagining power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this