Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From the diffusion to the appropriation of cost accounting in a French university: between institutional pressures and actors’ game

  • Hamza El Kaddouri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article presents the results of research conducted on the diffusion and appropriation of cost accounting at a French university (Hatchuel & Weil, 1992). Following the reforms put in place after the adoption of the LRU (Liberties and Responsibilities of Universities - Law on Universities) in 2007, this university adopted the SIFAC (Système d’Information Financier Analytique et Comptable - Analytical and Accounting Financial Information System) management tool, whose objective was to deeply modify the accounting and budgetary practices and allow the implementation of a cost accounting system (DiMaggio & Powel, 1983). But concretely, nine years after the implementation of the SIFAC tool, we noticed that, if technically, the accounting and budgetary practices have improved, the adoption of this tool did not lead to the implementation of a real cost accounting system. The findings showed that this situation could be explained by three factors: Factors related to the tool itself, factors related to the specificity of the host organization, and factors related to the priorities of the actors within this university.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-192
Number of pages11
JournalCorporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review
Volume6
Issue number2 Special Issue
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2022

Keywords

  • Actors’ Game
  • Appropriation
  • Cost Accounting
  • Diffusion
  • Universities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From the diffusion to the appropriation of cost accounting in a French university: between institutional pressures and actors’ game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this