Abstract
This article makes the case for clearer reporting of alternative provision. The main body of this paper consists of an analysis of available data on permanent exclusions and attendance at alternative provision. Findings show a greater number of young people attending alternative provision compared to those permanently excluded and concerning patterns of over representation among children in care and those with a special educational need or disability. This raises issues of children’s rights, particularly equality of educational experience and of fair access to the schooling system. It is argued that annual reporting on exclusions should be developed to include a section of in depth reporting on alternative provision.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 69-80 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Aug 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Alternative provision
- children in care
- exclusion
- risk ratio
- special educational needs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exclusions and alternative provision: piecing together the picture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver