Abstract
The pursuit of the EU membership has profoundly influenced the legal and judicial reforms undertaken by Albania, Serbia, and Ukraine. While each country
operates within its unique historical and political context, their shared objective of aligning with EU standards has led to notable similarities in their reform
efforts. At the same time, differences in their approaches reflect distinct national challenges and priorities.
In analysing and evaluating the impact of European procedural law on each of the examined country’s paths on the EU enlargement journey in turn, the chapter presents the reader with a brief background to the EU integration process of each country, followed by the analysis of procedural impact (including the discussion of the influence of the relevant instruments of EU civil procedural law on domestic reforms) and institutional impact (including the influence of the concepts developed by the ECtHR case law, ie judicial independence, quality and efficiency) on these countries’ reformative processes.
By examining their individual experiences within the broader context of EU enlargement, we gain insights into the complexities of legal integration and the pivotal role of judiciary reforms in shaping the future of these aspiring EU Member States.
operates within its unique historical and political context, their shared objective of aligning with EU standards has led to notable similarities in their reform
efforts. At the same time, differences in their approaches reflect distinct national challenges and priorities.
In analysing and evaluating the impact of European procedural law on each of the examined country’s paths on the EU enlargement journey in turn, the chapter presents the reader with a brief background to the EU integration process of each country, followed by the analysis of procedural impact (including the discussion of the influence of the relevant instruments of EU civil procedural law on domestic reforms) and institutional impact (including the influence of the concepts developed by the ECtHR case law, ie judicial independence, quality and efficiency) on these countries’ reformative processes.
By examining their individual experiences within the broader context of EU enlargement, we gain insights into the complexities of legal integration and the pivotal role of judiciary reforms in shaping the future of these aspiring EU Member States.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | European Civil Procedure |
| Editors | Xandra Kramer, Stefaan Voet, Adriani Dori |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| Chapter | 24 |
| Pages | 513-568 |
| Number of pages | 55 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783110781632 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783110775266 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Aug 2025 |
Keywords
- European Civil Procedure
- European Union
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'European civil procedure and the EU enlargement process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver