Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Don't turn a deaf ear: a case for assessing interactive listening

  • Daniel Lam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The reciprocal nature of spoken interaction means that participants constantly alternate between speaker and listener roles. However, listener or recipient actions – also known as interactive listening (IL) – are somewhat underrepresented in language tests. In conventional listening tests, they are not directly assessed. In speaking tests, they have often been overshadowed by an emphasis on production features or subsumed under broader constructs such as interactional competence. This paper is an effort to represent the rich IL phenomena that can be found in peer interactive speaking assessments, where the candidate-candidate format and discussion task offer opportunities to elicit and assess IL. Taking a close look at candidate discourse and non-verbal actions through a conversation analytic approach, the analysis focuses on three IL features: 1) listenership displays, 2) contingent responses, and 3) collaborative completions, and unpacks their relative strength in evidencing listener understanding. This paper concludes by making a case for revisiting the role of interactive listening, calling for more explicit inclusion of IL in L2 assessment as well as pedagogy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)740-764
Number of pages25
JournalApplied Linguistics
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • conversation analysis
  • interactional competence
  • language assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Don't turn a deaf ear: a case for assessing interactive listening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this