Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Developing outcome measures for serious mental illness; using early intervention as an example

  • Mark Agius
  • , Samir Shah
  • , Roshelle Ramkisson
  • , Suzanne Murphy
  • , Rashid Zaman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developing useful outcome measures for the treatment of serious mental illness remains an important challenge for the newly re-configured Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom, towards the latter part of the ten year period covered by the National Service Framework. The present authors have taken the opportunity to develop a method for measuring outcomes in psychotic illness while developing a service for Early Intervention in Psychosis. The results are mentioned shown, but will be discussed in detail elsewhere. This article will focus on the development of the method for outcome measurement itself. In particular, we shall argue for the need to use measurements which demonstrate functional improvement and improvement in quality of life. We shall show that, in order to measure outcomes, it is necessary to systematically record information from the first presentation of the case, so as later to be able to demonstrate what change has been accomplished. We shall also demonstrate that this activity is part of a necessary ongoing audit activity for services, but that, since there is no certain knowledge of what outcomes could have been expected prior to the implementation of new service developments, it is necessary to include a control group recruited from previous services, in order to establish meaningful benchmarks or norms to which the outcomes of a new service should be compared and judged. We argue that this methodology, despite the use of such a control group constitutes audit rather than research, but should be still amenable to statistical analysis. In order to be meaningful, and since serious mental illness may well be chronic, it is necessary that outcome measures should be carried out regularly, after specified periods of time. We also argue for the use of appropriate rating scales, which measure both the number and the intensity of symptoms and for computer based notes in order to facilitate regular audit.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychiatria Danubina
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • mental illness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing outcome measures for serious mental illness; using early intervention as an example'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this