Abstract
Government policies relating to dealers in ‘county lines’ drugs trafficking cases have been welcomed as a departure from punitive approaches to drugs and ‘gang’ policing, in that those on the bottom rung of the drugs economy of heroin and crack cocaine are no longer treated as criminals but as potential victims and ‘modern slaves’ in need of protection. However, our research suggests not so much a radical break with previous modes of policing as that the term ‘county lines’ emerged as a logical extension of the government’s racist and classist language surrounding ‘gangs’, knife crime and youth violence. Policies implemented in the name of safeguarding the vulnerable also act as a gateway for criminalisation not just under drugs laws but also modern slavery legislation. The government’s discovery of, and responses to, ‘county lines’ hinge on a moral crisis in the making, which ultimately deepens the state’s pre-emptive and violent criminalisation of the ‘Black criminal other’ at a time of deep political crisis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-26 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Race and Class |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Black youth
- county lines
- criminalisation
- drugs
- gangs
- modern slavery legislation
- policing
- safeguarding
- youth violence strategy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- Archeology (arts and humanities)
- Anthropology
- Archeology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘County lines’: racism, safeguarding and statecraft in Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver