Correction: The Regulate your Sitting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting time in individuals with type 2 diabetes: findings from a randomised-controlled feasibility trial (Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, (2024), 16, 1, (87), 10.1186/s13098-024-01336-6)

In Table 1 of this article [1], the data in the [Control (n = 35) Intervention (n = 35)] were calculated incorrectly. The correct version of Table 1 is given in this correction. (Table presented.) Demographic characteristics of the participants at baseline Control (n = 35) Intervention (n = 35) All (n = 70) Sex, n (%) Male 13 (37%) 18 (51%) 31 (44%) Female 22 (63%) 17 (49%) 39 (56%) Age (years), mean (SD) 55 (11) 60 (11) 58 (11) Ethnicity, n (%) Black, Asian and minority ethnic 22 (63%) 21 (60%) 43 (61%) White (any White background) 13 (37%) 14 (40%) 27 (39%) Education, mean (SD) Secondary school (e.g., high school) 8 (23%) 10 (29%) 18 (26%) Tertiary (e.g. university and above) 27 (77%) 25 (71%) 52 (74%) Married/cohabiting, n (%) Married/living as married 27 (77%) 17 (49%) 44 (63%) Single/separated/divorced/widowed 8 (23%) 18 (51%) 26 (37%) Employment status, n (%) Disabled 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 2 (3%) Employed full time 23 (66%) 12 (34%) 35 (50%) Employed part time 4 (11%) 4 (11%) 8 (11%) Retired 8 (23%) 14 (40%) 22 (31%) Student 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 2 (3%) Unemployed 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (1%) Had COVID prior to study start, n (%) No 31 (89%) 34 (97%) 65 (93%) Yes 4 (11%) 1 (3%) 5 (7%) Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on work/life, n (%) Currently shielding 6 (17%) 11 (31%) 17 (24%) Newly working from home 11 (31%) 8 (23%) 19 (27%) Unemployed or retired already 6 (17%) 10 (29%) 16 (23%) Lost their job 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (1%) Been furloughed 6 (17%) 0 (0%) 6 (9%) Currently self-isolating 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 4 (6%) None of the above 8 (23%) 4 (11%) 12 (17%) Other 4 (11%) 6 (17%) 10 (14%) Years living with type 2 diabetes^a, mean (SD) 11 (8) 12 (11) 11 (9) ^aData on years living with type 2 diabetes was only available for 54 participants (n = 28 for usual care control group and n = 26 for intervention group) The original article has been corrected.