Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing leaving-care policy and practice across the four nations of the United Kingdom: exploring similarities, differences, and implementation gaps

  • Queen's University Belfast
  • University of Johannesburg
  • Cardiff University
  • Independent researcher and consultant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

From an international comparative perspective, the four nations of the UK have robust legal and policy frameworks governing care-leaving. Measures taken include: access to aftercare workers; pathway planning; introduction of extended care arrangements (permitting young people to remain in placement beyond 18 years); and specific types of financial support. The paper explores commonalities and differences in approaches across the UK and illuminates how resource constraints, placement availability, workforce challenges and cultural norms may result in implementation gaps and a post-code lottery of provision. Findings lend weight to calls for attentiveness to, and systematic evaluation of, the implementation process to understand the challenges encountered in embedding effective support for care leavers. They also highlight the value of further comparative studies that explore the systems and subsystems of law, policy and practice in the four nations to contribute to more informed leaving care policy and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-195
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • care leavers
  • comparative policy
  • extended care
  • leaving care
  • out-of-home care
  • youth transitions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing leaving-care policy and practice across the four nations of the United Kingdom: exploring similarities, differences, and implementation gaps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this