Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the tension between government protestations that youth justice policy is evidence-led and what the evidence implies in the context of the age of criminal responsibility.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper takes the form of a conceptual analysis of government policy and the evidence base.
Findings
– The paper concludes that the current low age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales can be understood as a manifestation of the influence of underclass theory on successive governments.
Research limitations/implications
– The paper is not based on primary research.
Practical implications
– The arguments adduced help to explain the reluctance of government to countenance any increase in the age of criminal responsibility.
Social implications
– The analysis might help inform approaches adopted by youth justice policy makers, practitioners and academics with an interest in seeking a rise in the age of criminal responsibility.
Originality/value
– The paper offers an original analysis of government intransigence on an important social issue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-142 |
| Journal | Safer Communities |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Children's rights
- The age of criminal responsibility
- Underclass theory
- evidence-based policy
- youth justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Catching them young” – some reflections on the meaning of the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver