Abstract
Traditional liberal theory portrays the role of media as a watchdog that holds the state accountable. This model, however, does not take into account the other shareholders. Therefore, it does not guarantee “a check on the abuse of all sources of power in both the public and private realms” (Curran 2005, 124). While state media can be accused of aligning with official policies, private media can be argued to compromise institutional independence or downgrade investigative journalism in favor of lighter and more popular genres (Curran 2005, 129). In the case of Arab media, private media ventures have contributed to increasing competitiveness among local and regional media outlets, although it can be argued that these media are fettered by the state.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Mass Communication in the Modern Arab World |
| Subtitle of host publication | Ongoing Agents of Change following the Arab Spring |
| Editors | Hamdy Naila Nabil, Auter Philip |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
| Pages | 51-62 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9798881849221 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781538140031 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- Arab media
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences
- General Business,Management and Accounting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analyzing media power in the Arab world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver