Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abused women’s perceptions of professionals’ responses: valued support, or collusion with perpetrator?

  • Jo Neale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is recognised as a serious public health issue that detrimentally affects the lives of victims during, and after exiting, the relationship. For staff in overstretched criminal justice, health and social care agencies, high prevalence rates of DVA place a significant strain on the financial and emotional resources available to them. Drawing on Angie Ash’s (2013) concept of ‘cognitive masks’, and using data collected as part of a larger study, I examine the responses from agencies that frustrated women’s attempts to leave an abusive male partner. Fourteen women, recruited via three specialist support agencies in two English counties and my own personal networks, participated in semi-structured narrative style interviews. Findings suggest that practitioners sometimes ignore significant aspects of the case, thus rendering the situation more manageable – for themselves. For women, however, this can frustrate their attempts to exit the relationship and remain abuse-free.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-427
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Gender-Based Violence
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Cognitive mask
  • Collusion
  • Domestic violence and abuse (DVA)
  • Identity
  • Street-level bureaucracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abused women’s perceptions of professionals’ responses: valued support, or collusion with perpetrator?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this