Abstract
These young people are challenging the assumption that they are consenting to CSE. In this chapter I argue that too often young people’s ‘consent’ to CSE is taken for granted or assumed, and by default, the young person feels blamed for the abuse they experience. I argue that this is intricately linked to our current understanding of young people’s ‘consent’ to sexual activity which is based on a medical model that assesses their intellectual capacity to understand and use contraceptives. This is inadequate as a framework for understanding the pressures on those who might be sexually exploited. A ‘social model’ of consent would enable consent to be contextualised, shedding light on how ‘consent’ may be distorted through abusive and exploitative relationships and/or contexts. This would eventually challenge what I call ‘condoned consent’: the process by which some practitioners may fail to identify and challenge sexual exploitation. Without a social model helping us to contextualise ‘consent’, too many young people are left feeling that they are responsible for the abuse they experience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Critical Perspectives on Child Sexual Exploitation and Related Trafficking |
| Editors | Margaret Melrose, Jenny Pearce |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Chapter | 5 |
| Pages | 52-68 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781137294104 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781137294098 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Sept 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A social model of 'abused consent''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver