Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A critical review of the 2025 RSHE guidance and alternative approach framed in safe uncertainty

  • University of Surrey

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This policy review critically examines the English government's 2025 statutory guidance on Relationships Education, Relationship and Sex Education and Health Education (RSHE), analysing its educational assumptions, strengths and limitations through the lens of safe uncertainty. While the updated guidance somewhat reinstates key inclusive elements and promotes social and emotional literacy, it continues to position RSHE as a risk domain requiring tight control and cautious delivery. This review highlights areas of concern including contradictions in the guidance's treatment of digital image sharing, the approach to gender and the conditional framing of children's rights and participation. Drawing on the concept of safe uncertainty, we advocate a more coherent rights-based framework, clearer policy direction and sustained investment in teacher support and infrastructure. We call for RSHE policy and practice to move beyond compliance and certainty, and instead build relational, reflective and dialogic spaces where students can engage meaningfully with the ethical and social dimensions of their lives. In doing so, RSHE can fulfil its broader educational promise in preventing harm and supporting the flourishing of students as relational and sexual citizens.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCHILDREN & SOCIETY
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Relationship and Sex Education and Health Educatio
  • sexual citizenship
  • RSHE
  • pedagogy
  • safe uncertainty
  • children's rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health (social science)
  • Education
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical review of the 2025 RSHE guidance and alternative approach framed in safe uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this